Kinematics simulation softwares cannot distinguish incorrect NC code during post processor and after you inspect the process as the correct one, if you operate same NC code in CNC machine, you receive only awful results. Because kinematics simulation can show a simulation of NC codes for related machine before posted. Kinematics simulation programs can give you an idea about how a piece will be manufactured and what the tool path will be, but more importantly it is not a real NC simulation. The second one is known as the simulation software and it simulates NC code in the same way for CNC machine. Instead, it is an untransformed (into NC code) raw data of tool path simulation software. But it is not the one which operate in machiness. The first one is the software known as 'Kinematics Simulation', which works in accordance with CAM programs. For that purpose, there are only 2 kind of simulation program at the present time. To pinpoint any error arising from NC codes beforehand and guarantee manfuactorying accurately can be done by only well CNC simulation program. But just having a proper CAM program and post processor does not guarantee most efficient and safest operation. Using CAM programs and post processor can offer great deal of efficiency. During manufactoring, multi-axis CNC machines have many advantages,however they are not easy to use.
As the number of that sort of complex CNC machines increases, in order to eliminate adversities and inconveniences encountered CAM programs, post processor solutions and simulation programs seen as major essentials have become a must. I would suggest posting something very simple and modify the posted gcode by hand until it works, then the post processor can be modified to match.Difficulties due to rapid developments of The Defense and Aviation Industry in our country have necessitated multi-axis CNC machines. The ISO post is including a + symbol on positive values and G codes are being called using double digits like G01 vs G1 in your sample. I don't see anything glaringly obvious unless your control is being picky. Your MC post looks most like the ISO post so it would be the easiest to modify. I posted some samples using both the Heidenhain TNC-407.cps and the Heidenhain ISO.cps sample post processors to compare to your MC post.
0 kommentar(er)
