The answer to both Fragen is a resounding YES. Still, the film must be reviewed, so the two big Fragen to address are: does this chapter end the series on a strong note? And is Deathly Hallows: Part 2 a good movie in its own right? So, taking that all into account, it’s easy to see why the majority of moviegoers will be headed to the theater to see Deathly Hallows: Part 2 with little regard oder care for what critics have to say about it. As such, it’s Mehr fitting to call it “a cinematic event,” rather than your run-of-the-mill movie release. It’s not a standalone film (rather the Sekunde half of the Deathly Hallowstale), while also serving as the closing chapter to a movie franchise that has spanned eight films over the course of a decade, and become part of a worldwide phenomenon. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is all but impossible to review in the traditional sense. Without spoiling too much for people that haven’t read the books, Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) continue to hunt the horcruxes that are keeping Voldemort (Ralph Finnes) alive, while around them the war is over, and he-who-must-not-be-named has won. It picks up immediately where Part 1 ended and hits the ground running. The movie begins without much introduction. It will make Mehr sense in terms of the narrative flow. If possible, watch Part 1 immediately before watching Part 2. Rather than having its own three-act structure, Part 2 essentially begins during the middle of the Sekunde act, which began in Part 1. Deathly Hallows - Part 2 is not so much a sequel as it is just a continuation of Part 1.
0 kommentar(er)
